What Lib Dem members think about top-rate tax: 53% back 50p (or higher) BUT only if it raises more revenue
by Stephen Tall on May 2, 2014
Lib Dem Voice has polled our members-only forum to discover what Lib Dem members think of various political issues, the Coalition, and the performance of key party figures. More than 830 party members responded – thank you – and we’re publishing the full results.
53% support 50p (or higher) top-rate of tax; 31% say stick at 45p; 13% back 40p (or lower)
Currently the top rate of income tax is 45p in the pound for earnings over £150,000. Which rate do you support this top rate being set at?
43% – 50p in the pound for earnings over £150,000
10% – Higher than 50p in the pound for earnings over £150,000
31% – 45p in the pound for earnings over £150,000
11% – 40p in the pound for earnings over £150,000
2% – Lower than 40p in the pound for earnings over £150,000
4% – Don’t know
Last September, Lib Dem conference voted – by a wafer-thin margin of just 4 votes – to reject a 50p top-rate of tax. However, our survey finds that a narrow-but-clear majority of party members support raising the top-rate (as indeed our survey found last year).
In total, 53% of Lib Dem members want to see the top-rate at 50p or higher for every £ of income earned above £150k. Almost a third (31%) are content to see the top-rate where it is now, at 45p in the £. Just 13% of Lib Dems back Jeremy Browne’s proposal in his book Race Plan that the top-rate should be reduced to 40p or even lower.
Here’s a sample of your comments…
• We need to move away from taxing income and towards taxing wealth. Obsessing about high top rates that raise little or no money flies in the face of that agenda.
• 45p in the pound but starting at £70,000 with abolition of the 40p rate
• The Lib Dem MP’s where a disgrace in allowing the Tories and the super rich off, when millions are struggling
• People should keep the majority of their marginal earnings if they are to have the incentive to work further and increase GDP etc It’s also just.
• We cannot support the level of government spending that will remain after all the current projected cuts unless we raise more taxes. We should also increase taxes on property through additional council tax bands. Council tax on expensive properties in London is ridiculously low.
• Further BANDS for still higher earners.
• As long as the £150,000 is adjusted for inflation, otherwise everyone will finish up paying it, as increasing numbers pay 40% now. Fiscal drag.
• It’s a drop in the ocean. Capital gains tax and Corporation tax are more significant but receive no coverage
• In the long term I’m happy with 20-ish and 40-ish, provided we do far, far more on avoidance and evasion. For now, a 50% rate would be right.
• Why the simplistic obsession with tax rates at round figures? I think it would make sense to have a top rate of income at around 48 p – it would still be competitive internationally, it would not drive anyone out of the UK, but it would generate more revenue than the current 45 per cent top income tax rate.
• Higher for those earning ove £1M
• All income taxes should be a bit lower, with a new tax on wealth to raise more from the rich. Failing that, the 50 per cent top rate tax should be reinstated if it would raise more money.
• income tax must include all sources of wealth equally
• The revenue raised is less important than the disincentive effect for highly mobile entrepreneurs to invest in the UK
• Should amalgamate income tax and NI: currently total is 47% for above 150 K as against 32% from 10 K up.
• It would make people on very low incomes feel that we are in it together – all categories have benefitted from the raised tax thresholds
• See what high income tax is doing to the French economy. Keep it reasonable for all earners. Higher tax for top earners does not bring in the income for the state that people think it does.
• Everyone talks about whether 45% is the right rate but nobody seems to talk about whether £150,000 is the right level for it to apply.
BUT 60% would oppose 50p rate IF it could be shown it raised no extra money
Imagine it was the case that a top tax rate of 50p did not bring in any extra money. Which of the following would best reflect your view?
60% – If a 50p top tax rate would not bring in any extra money then it should not be introduced
32% – A 50p top tax rate should be introduced even if would not bring in any extra money – it is only right that the rich should pay higher taxes
7% – Neither
2% – Don’t know
This question triggered an interesting response. By a clear margin, 60% to 32%, most Lib Dem members would oppose a 50p top-rate of tax that didn’t bring in extra revenue – BUT the comments submitted show more passionate and nuanced views than that headline would suggest, with many arguing for a shift to wealth taxation combined with much tougher crackdowns on high-earners reducing their tax liabilities. Here’s a sample of your comments…
• This IS the case and it’s wrong to support overtaxing people without any benefit to the public purse in order to make a point of punishing high earners
• PLUS a Mansion Tax!
• I do no accept the premis eof the question. If these people are dodging tax, then fix that then put the tax rate up.
• …and please ensure they do pay! Too much effort is put into benefit frauds and not enough to tax cheats
• It depends from where you start. I would not have reduced the 50p rate to 45p because the amounts raised are piffling but now that it is here I would not increase it for the same reason.
• Squeeze the bastards until the pips squeak.
• Where would this evidence come from and how would it be independently verified and tested?
• If a 50p tax rate that existed for more than a year proved not to bring in any extra money in the long term, then it should be amended.
• It’s the principle of the thing, stupid!
• A 50p tax rate should not be introduced , we should not tax at source of earnings but on purchases, capital gains, propertys and assets increased in value due to the success of our economy.
• And tighten tax avoidable, evasion. Employ more tax inspectors.
• The tax regime should be simplified so that income, salaries and other benefits are all taxed at the same rate. If it could be shown that people receiving salary, bonus, sundry benefits, share options etc. were paying paying about 30% on the whole package, the system would appear to be fairer.
• The rate at which tax is levied is only a part of the problem. Dealing with avoidance,
• evasion is the main issue. Legislation must be past to address this national ‘disease’!
• Loopholes might be a higher priority along wth restrictions on non dom status.
• I think the question should also be asked the other way round. If 50p did raise significant revenue, should it be introduced?
• However the question ignores that there could be other policies such as increasing CGT that might make this policy work better.
• Of course it would, don’t propose such right-wing nonsense
• Something has to be done to reduce inequality in the UK, tax is one way alternatives would be a higher minimum wage or restrictions on high salaries and bonuses that create antisocial behaviour.
• I don’t accept the question. 50p would bring in more money if tax loopholes were closed
• Imagine any politician actually knew the answer to this question, then ask me again.
* Stephen Tall is Co-Editor of Liberal Democrat Voice, and editor of the 2013 publication, The Coalition and Beyond: Liberal Reforms for the Decade Ahead. He is also a Research Associate for the liberal think-tank CentreForum and writes at his own site, The Collected Stephen Tall.