grab our rss feed

stephentall.org

The Collected Stephen Tall

Cam’s Euro U-turn – this is what happens when you fail to negotiate

Much wailing and gnashing of teeth today on the right as evidence emerges that David Cameron is backsliding on his ‘veto’ preventing the European Union from enforcing fiscal integration among the Eurozone countries. Here’s how The Guardian reports it:

Ahead of Monday’s summit of EU leaders, which is due to finalise “political agreement” on the fiscal compact treaty, the government signalled that it would not challenge a role for the European commission and, more sensitively, would also allow resort to the European court of justice (ECJ) in Luxembourg to enforce new debt ceilings and fines for fiscal miscreants in the eurozone. ..

Cameron is understood to have made it clear to José Manuel Barroso, the president of the European commission, in a telephone call on Wednesday that Britain would no longer object to using the ECJ to enforce the new treaty. … Cameron’s concession marks a significant watering down of his previous position and represents a victory for Nick Clegg, who has been urging the prime minister to recover ground after wielding the veto. The deputy prime minister lobbied hard inside Whitehall for Cameron to drop his objections to the use of EU institutions to enforce the compact.

There’s good reason for Nick Clegg’s stance. The only way the UK would be able forcibly to prevent Eurozone countries from making use of the European court of justice would to challenge it in the courts. Legally there’s no guarantee such a challenge would work. And politically it would pit the UK against the vast majority of its neighbours who have signed-up to use the ECJ — not a smart move.

Mr Cameron has landed the UK in neither a winning nor an attractive position. But that is what happens when — as the Prime Minister did in December — you issue an ultimatum without laying the necessary groundwork, and then walk out of the negotiations before you can gain any concessions.

Of course, none of this may now matter to Mr Cameron. His ‘veto’, however unintentional, earned him rave reviews from his backbenchers and the right-wing media, and is credited with providing the Tories with the polling boost that has seen them overtake Labour, piling more pressure on the beleaguered Ed Miliband. That just a few weeks later the Prime Minister now backs down over technicalities such as the ECJ, which few will understand or care about, will probably matter little to the political mood music.

But the stark truth of the matter is that Mr Cameron’s cack-handed negotiating has delivered nothing of lasting significance for the UK.

* Stephen Tall is Co-Editor of Liberal Democrat Voice, and also writes at his own site, The Collected Stephen Tall.

LDV Caption Competition: Eds Balls and Miliband “The Early Years” Edition

There’s no prize at stake – just the opportunity to prove you’re wittier than any other LDV reader…


(Image from The Guardian.)

Here’s Labour top two Eds — the party leader and shadow chancellor — pictured in their salad days, Spadding for the Blair/Brown government. What do you think might be being said or thought by or about them?

And the winner of our last caption comp is…

Some fantastic entries for our most recent caption competition, Michael Gove “May the Lego be with you” Edition.

The winner, according to The Voice’s judging panel of one, was this one by Tim Leunig, with a highly commended offering by Jason here.

Got a photo of a prominent Lib Dem you think would work well for a future caption competition? Then please email us at .

* Stephen Tall is Co-Editor of Liberal Democrat Voice, and also writes at his own site, The Collected Stephen Tall.

Liam Burns, tuition fees and the death of irony

With tuition fees of up to £9k due to kick-in for this year’s university entrants, the thorny issue of application numbers is bound to generate controversy: has the price hike deterred potential students, or had no effect?

The release of early data in October, suggesting an inital sharp drop, sparked controversy, not all of it well-informed as Mark Pack pointed out on LibDemVoice here.

So it’s good news that my colleagues at The Sutton Trust are establishing an independent commission, headed by Will Hutton, to assess the effect of fee increases, looking in particular at young people from poor and middle-income families. As Mr Hutton noted:

“We will be keeping an open mind; the aim will be to produce a dispassionate and authoritative analysis of the data as it emerges.”

Quite right, too.

And then I read this gem of a quote from Liam Burns, president of the National Union of Students, who successfully shows how you can express two contracdictory thoughts at the same time and think you make sense:

“A balanced and truly independent analysis that puts aside any of the panellists preconceptions about the merits or otherwise of the fees system is vital to ensure vulnerable students do not have to abandon their ambitions in higher education.”

@stephentall’s weekly Twitter updates for 2012-01-27

Figures show best-performing state schools cheaper than the average

The school league tables were published yesterday, and this snippet from The Guardian caught my attention:

The tables also show the average state secondary school spends £5,712 per pupil, but 30 state schools spend more than £10,000 per pupil. In state schools where over 90% of pupils achieve five or more grades at A* to C at GCSE, including English and maths, average spend is £5,096 per pupil.

So the best-performing state schools spend less per pupil than the average school.

In one sense this is obvious. Schools which are under-performing will have money targeted at them — indeed, the Lib Dems’ ‘pupil premium’ explicitly targets children who qualify for free school meals (family income <£16,000), which will therefore produce a higher per pupil average cost in the challenging schools where low attainment is an issue.

Still, the figure is interesting. For a start, it strikes me as incredibly efficient — a top-quality education for £5k a year is deeply impressive. And secondly, it does suggest there’s more to children’s attainment than simply money: supportive families, effective teaching, high aspirations exert a much more powerful influence.

LDVideo: Clegg – “the Coalition is calling time on our unfair and out-of-whack tax system”

Nick Clegg’s tax cut speech dominated the political headlines yesterday — you can watch a 4-minute snippet below:


(Available on the BBC website here.)

Here’s what my LibDemVoice colleagues had to say about Nick’s call for lower taxes:

  • Clegg’s call for income tax cuts for the low paid is welcome, but will the Tories back him? by Nick Thornsby
  • Nick Clegg returns to income tax by Mark Pack
  • And here’s how the rest of the Lib Dem blogosphere reacted:

  • How will Nick Clegg’s call for more tax cuts be received by his fellow Liberal Demcrats? by Jonathan Calder;
  • An interesting world when Lib Dem policy launch is the lead new story by Jonathan Wallace;
  • Day 4043: Yes to Help for Low Earners, But We NEED to Help the No-Earners Too! by Millennium Elephant;
  • Nick Clegg rightly calls for the tax system to be made fairer by Social Liberal Forum;
  • Another fine liberal moment for Clegg by Daniel Furr;
  • Nick Clegg makes the case for lower taxes for lower paid by Alex Folkes;
  • Lib Dems push for more money back in your pocket by Iain Roberts;
  • Yes Labour, we do have a cheek and so do you by Lisa Harding;
  • Let’s start with an apology to @charlotteahenry… by Richard Morris;
  • A Mixed Bag from Clegg by Peter Wrigley;
  • Letter from Vince Cable – LibDem leadership go big on tax cuts by Paul Walter;
  • LibDems pushing for more tax cuts to help low-paid by Frank Little.
  • All in all, a good day’s work for Nick — advancing a policy which is not only right in principle, but which is also popular, AND differentiates the Lib Dems from both the Tories and Labour.

    * Stephen Tall is Co-Editor of Liberal Democrat Voice, and also writes at his own site, The Collected Stephen Tall.

    The day the Coalition broke. Literally.

    image

    Some might call it mere coincidence, but I ask you… On the very day Nick Clegg announces his desire for the government to push harder and faster with tax cuts for the low-paid, I come home to discover my commemorative Coalition mug smashed to pieces.

    It could have been one of our cats.

    But to me it seems at least as likely to have been a Tory right-winger shaking hard with disbelief that tax-cuts could apply to anyone other than the wealthiest in society.

    LDVideo: Danny Alexander on the Coalition’s economic record

    Lib Dem chief secretary to the treasury Danny Alexander was grilled by BBC Newsnight’s Jeremy Paxman on Wednesday night about the UK’s negative growth figures — here’s what Danny had to say about the Coalition’s economic strategy:


    (Available on the BBC website here.)

    * Stephen Tall is Co-Editor of Liberal Democrat Voice, and also writes at his own site, The Collected Stephen Tall.

    The last book I read in 100 words: Soldiers of Salamis by Javier Cercas


    Soldiers of Salamis (Soldados de Salamina), Javier Cercas

    The first book I read by Cercas (his most recent) was The Anatomy of a Moment, a factual work of historical interpretation. Soldiers of Salamis is a fictional work of historical imagination.

    The novel is authored by a fictional ‘Javier Cercas’, an alter ego who tells the story of the real Rafael Sánchez Mazas, a “good, not great” writer and nationalist leader of the Falange, Spain’s Fascist movement, who fled a firing squad and only evaded re-capture and certain death thanks to “an anonymous defeated soldier”, a republican ‘forest friend’.

    Divided into three parts — the first focuses on ‘Cercas’s’ decision to investigate the truth of Sánchez Mazas’s escape, the second is a not unsympathetic reconstruction of Sánchez Mazas’s plight — the third section, when ‘Cercas’ befriends Miralles, the man he believes allowed Sánchez Mazas to go free, is an utterly absorbing yet tender setpiece, suffused with paradoxical reflections on honour and heroism, memory and reality.

    Some find Cercas’s syntactically circumlocutory style off-putting; for me it is inseparable from the rational justice that inhabits his words. A quite remarkable writer.

    Dealing with Labour’s mess, Part 93: Lib Dems secure future of post offices

    Remember the last Labour government’s record on post offices? Their numbers fell by more than 7,100, or 38%. But not any more, as a result of Lib Dem action within the Coalition — as Lib Dem Voice first reported here almost 18 months ago.

    This is how the Press Association reports it:

    The Government has secured the future of the Post Office under a 10-year deal giving certainty to postmasters, ministers have announced. The long-term arrangements between the Post Office and the Royal Mail will be reached before the two are separated under the Government’s controversial privatisation plans. Sub-postmasters welcomed the move but the Communication Workers Union said it was the end of an era for a fully publicly-owned postal service.

    Postal Affairs Minister Edward Davey said: “Concerns people had about the Post Office becoming independent from Royal Mail were always misplaced as that separation is part of our cure, but the 10-year deal struck between Royal Mail and the Post Office will give sub-postmasters and others greater confidence. Coupled with winning new contracts and the successful pilots of new operating models, the signs are extremely encouraging for the future of the Post Office.”

    The announcement is further evidence of Lib Dem Ed Davey’s success in his ministerial role — as noted by Mark Pack here — and why he’s being tipped for the cabinet.

    Fellow Lib Dem MP Lorely Burt, Co-Chair of the party’s Parliamentary Committee on Business, Innovation and Skills, joined Ed in welcoming the news:

    “This is very welcome news for both the Post Office and Royal Mail and demonstrates our commitment to ensure a sustainable future for both. Post Offices are a vital part of our communities and are the lynchpin of our towns and villages. More than 20m people visit a Post Office every week to send letters to loved ones, to manage their finances or to renew passports for holidays and hundreds of thousands of pensioners rely on them every day for their pensions.

    “Labour left Royal Mail in a terrible mess and it is Liberal Democrats in the Coalition Government who have stopped closures and put Royal Mail and the Post Office on a secure footing. Our plans mean that we will never see the kind of planned closures that devastated local communities under the previous Government.

    “Labour said our plans would lead to more closures as the Royal Mail moved away from using the Post Office network. Today’s announcement proves that they were, once again, wrong.”

    Lorely is right to note Labour’s knee-jerk oppositionism (despite their own dire record in government). Here, for example, is what shadow chancellor Ed Balls had to say back when he was contesting his party’s leadership:

    “I will fight against the Con-Dem plans, which endanger this vital and popular public service.”

    Contrast Ed’s predictable doom with the words today of National Federation of SubPostmasters (NFSP) general secretary George Thomson:

    “Sub-postmasters will welcome the security which this news brings, which will help provide them with the confidence necessary to invest in their businesses for the future.”

    * Stephen Tall is Co-Editor of Liberal Democrat Voice, and also writes at his own site, The Collected Stephen Tall.