Clegg 'annoyed' not to be meeting Obama

by Stephen Tall on April 1, 2009

I preface this with a health-warning: the story is by Richard Key in the Daily Mail. Still, it comes with direct attributed quotes…

With all the fanfare surrounding the Obama visit, meeting the new U.S. president has become the hottest ticket in town. In short order he will see the Queen, Gordon Brown and David Cameron, but one figure who will not shake the presidential hand during the G20 conference is Nick Clegg. …

‘I am really annoyed,’ he told me. ‘As it was not a state visit I understood I wouldn’t get to see him. But when I found out Obama was meeting the Queen and David Cameron I got on the phone to David Miliband to ask him what was going on.

‘Frankly, it doesn’t look good for Cameron to see him and for me not to.’

The outburst came just moments before Obama’s plane touched down at Stansted airport. Instead of preparing to meet the president, Clegg was at the launch of Vince Cable’s new book on the economic crisis at the National Liberal Club.

At one point he turned to Cable and told him: ‘If I do get to go, I will give Obama a copy of your book.’ … Clegg’s appeal to Miliband is unlikely to succeed. Obama is not meeting any other opposition leaders during his later trip to Europe.

At first sight this might seem like grand-standing from Nick. But he does have a point, I think – this isn’t a state visit, and so there is no reason of protocol why President Obama shouldn’t meet the leader of the Liberal Democrats. Ah, foes will say, but the Lib Dems are not the main opposition party. True enough – but that didn’t stop Gordon Brown from ensuring that the Lib Dem shadow cabinet should be able to meet with the corresponding permanent secretaries of their departments.

Apart from anything else, it might be nice for President Obama to meet a senior British politician who, like him, actually opposed the Iraq war at the time.

Update: The Spectator’s Coffee House blog has picked up on the story, too, and reckon this is not (as a couple of commenters have speculated) an April Fool’s joke from Richard Key. But Nick’s office has refuted the quotes attributed to him:

Clegg’s office says that Clegg did not speak to Richard Kay. They also emphatically deny that he has called Miliband to try and get in to see Obama. In a way, what is surprising is that, when Obama announced his intention to meet with Cameron, the government didn’t try and get him to meet with Clegg as well to dilute the impact of the Cameron-Obama meeting.

Enjoy reading this? Please like and share:

No comments

I think Nick Clegg looks like a real light-weight by going public with this.

by Matthew Cain on April 1, 2009 at 1:38 pm. Reply #

I must admit I assumed this was an April fool. Are you saying it isn’t?

by Tom on April 1, 2009 at 1:58 pm. Reply #

It does say “Last updated at 12:00 AM on 01st April 2009”

by Anonymous1 on April 1, 2009 at 2:01 pm. Reply #

I don’t know. It seems sort of fair to me for Clegg to say this. After all, Bush met Kennedy (when we had fewer seats too).

by Thomas on April 1, 2009 at 2:10 pm. Reply #

JFK invited Jo Grimond to the White House.

The party is far more influential now than it was in the early 60s so Obama should meet Nick.

by Antony Hook on April 1, 2009 at 2:34 pm. Reply #

Bush met Charles Kennedy in 2003.

by Andy Hinton on April 1, 2009 at 2:43 pm. Reply #

@Thomas Of course it’s an April Fool!

by Matthew Cain on April 1, 2009 at 3:38 pm. Reply #

Not everyone has realised this, it seems…

by Alix on April 1, 2009 at 4:01 pm. Reply #

If it is an April Fool, it’s a pretty poor one, because Clegg has said so many more embarrassing things than this to journalists.

by Anonymous1 on April 1, 2009 at 4:21 pm. Reply #

In fact, funnily enough, exactly a year ago today people were discussing Clegg’s interview for GQ magazine in much the same terms – “Are you sure this isn’t an April Fool?”

by Anonymous1 on April 1, 2009 at 4:35 pm. Reply #

Richard Kay says it’s not an April Fool on the Spectator blog:

by Tom on April 1, 2009 at 4:50 pm. Reply #

So we’re down to Clegg denying he said it and Richard Kay insisting he did?

by Anonymous1 on April 2, 2009 at 12:09 am. Reply #

Although Clegg just denies he spoke to Richard Kay and that he phoned Miliband, which is not quite the same thing. Hm. On the other hand I cannot believe he’d be daft enough to say all that in deadly earnest to a Mail journalist.

But I can easily see him bantering at the photocall that, e.g. he wished he had got an appointment with Obama so he could give him Vince’s book. If it’s something like that, then it’s just the Mail being sly, mendacious knobheads. Again.

by Alix on April 2, 2009 at 8:12 am. Reply #

“On the other hand I cannot believe he’d be daft enough to say all that in deadly earnest to a Mail journalist.”

Surely he’s said plenty of daft things to journalists since he became leader?

by Anonymous1 on April 2, 2009 at 9:30 am. Reply #

Yeah, but that’s *really* daft. I never thought the 30 women thing was at all daft, remember. I’m still pretty disgusted it was any sort of issue at all. And on the plane thing he wasn’t daft to say any of it, just daft to be overheard. This Mail guy’s implying he said these things to his face, in all seriousness. I just don’t buy it. Clegg’s not daft in that way.

by Alix Mortimer on April 2, 2009 at 10:06 am. Reply #

If you follow the link Richard Kay has posted in the spectator blog comments.

1. Direct allegation that Clegg spoke to Alan Davidson who works for the Diary. This can be easierly reconciled with the Clegg office statement that he didn’t speak to Richard Kay.

2. Cleggs Office’s Statement denies that he rang Milliband to try and get in to see Obama. The article doesn’t alledge that. Clegg is quoted as ring Milliband to see what is going on which is different.

I have no idea what has happened and its yesterdays chip wrapping. However (a) Clegg’s office has clearly issued a non denial denial. (b) journalists don’t put things in direct quotation marks lightly. Even the Mail.

by David Morton on April 4, 2009 at 2:20 pm. Reply #

Leave your comment


Required. Not published.

If you have one.