by Stephen Tall on March 7, 2014
Lib Dem MP Tom Brake backs the idea of job-sharing MPs over at Lib Dem Voice:
… if we want parliamentarians to know about life outside Westminster, we should be prepared to make it easier for them to have one. In business, the civil service and the trade unions, people have realised that job-sharing opens up their organisations to a much wider range of talent, of both genders and of all ages and family circumstances.
I’m afraid I just don’t buy it. For a start, I think job-sharing MPs would end up having to work at least as hard as any non-job-sharing MPs, bending over backwards to prove they’re not part-timers
But the other problem I have with it is, quite simply, this: it makes elections about what’s good for the candidates not about what’s good for the public. Though intended to boost the representation of women in the House of Commons, I suspect it would have the opposite effect, with voters reacting against an arrangement many would see as confusing and distracting.
It doesn’t happen very often, but I agree with irascible Lib Dem peer Tony Greaves:
The way to share out areas between different MPs is by STV, not silly technical ways to fix the system.