A look back at the polls: March

by Stephen Tall on March 28, 2008

We tend not to be too poll-obsessed here at LDV – of course we look at them, as do all other politico-geeks, but viewed in isolation no one poll will tell you very much beyond what you want to read into it. Looked at over a reasonable time-span and, if there are enough polls, you can see some trends.

Here, in chronological order, are the results of the most recent six polls since our last round-up on 29th February:

Tories 40%, Labour 33%, Lib Dems 16% – YouGov/Telegraph (1st Mar)
Tories 37%, Labour 34%, Lib Dems 19% – Populus/Times (11th Mar)
Tories 40%, Labour 31%, Lib Dems 20% – ICM/News of the World (16th Mar)
Tories 43%, Labour 27%, Lib Dems 16% – YouGov/Sunday Times (16th Mar)
Tories 42%, Labour 29%, Lib Dems 21% – ICM/Guardian (18th Mar)
Tories 43%, Labour 29%, Lib Dems 17% – YouGov/Telegraph (28th Mar)

Which gives us an average rating for the parties in March as follows, compared with February’s average:
Tories 41% (+2%), Labour 31% (-2%), Lib Dems 18% (n/c)

Generally I’m sceptical that opinion polls tell you over much about the fluctuations in the daily churn of political life; most movements, up and down, are within the margin of error. However, it does seem to be the case that Alastair Darling’s budget has proven something of a watershed for the Labour Government: three of the four post-budget polls have shown them below 30%.

There’s been much speculation why this might be, given that none of the budget measures in themselves seem to have been especially unpopular. Perhaps it was just the general drab disappointment of this budget, another confirmation that Gordon Brown’s premiership promises precious little ambition. Of course, half the polls published in March were from YouGov, which has tended to be the most pro-Tory pollster (though usually at the expense of the Lib Dems, rather than Labour).

It will be interesting to see the next Ipsos-Mori poll. So far, they have been the only pollster all year to discern a Labour lead (of 1%, back in January). If they too show Labour’s support dipping to c.30%, then alarm bells will really start to ring at Labour HQ.

For the Lib Dems, March showed another incremental increase in poll support, not displayed in our average owing to rounding down to 18% this month (but up to 18% last month). This in spite of the difficulties the party experienced around the Lisbon Treaty referendum. Clearly there’s some truth in the adage that if there’s one thing worse than being talked about, it’s not being talked about.

Nick Clegg’s first 100 days might not yet have shown meteoric progress in the polls; but there has been solid progress, and the leadership will be quietly pleased to see our average ratings in the high teens, and consistently at or around 20% with ICM.

Enjoy reading this? Please like and share:

No comments

Talking of polls, Andrew Grice in the Independant reports one of City people.
It suggests that two-thirds of City people think Boris is “too much of a bufoon”. I’m not sure if this means that the City has a high tolerance of bufoonery, or that one third of them have not yet focussed on Boris.

by Diversity on March 28, 2008 at 7:12 pm. Reply #

I think the ‘time for a change’ mood is growing, not quite to the extent it did in 1997 but it’s their nonetheless; I think alot of people saw the budget as not especially dislikeable but it looked like it came from a government which didnt really have much zip or many fresh ideas.

Nick Clegg should be pleased, he has established himself and we are steady in the polls; in this volitile climate not an inconsiderable achievement. Also it is good news because it shows we are not flaking support to the Tories despite them coming up in the polls. In other words, they are taking voters off Labour, not us. I think we should align ourself to capture the sentiment for change but focus on what kind of change people want.

by Darrell on March 28, 2008 at 7:19 pm. Reply #

Interesting times!
The public mood has changed over the last year as Brown has made a poor impact, compounded with the economic fears. The Lib Dems are well placed to advance in the next two years – by how much is down to us & ‘events’……

by Greenfield on March 29, 2008 at 7:36 am. Reply #

This list includes 3 YouGov polls. Really a good list would just include the latest from each polling organisation.

Not that I am too bothered by them at this stage in a parliament (though I prefer to see us going up and Labour going down when I am personally going to the polls like this year!)

Tony Greaves

by Tony Greaves on March 29, 2008 at 3:09 pm. Reply #

The poll of polls on Conservative home is better because it irons out the creases like the one Lord Greaves points out in this sample. ie 3 You Govs.

What strikes me though is the very clear message. In the 2001 to 2005 parliament diffected labour voters went overwhelmingly to the Lib Dems. Now the Headline figures suggest they are going overwhelmingly to the Tory’s.

When voters pick the principal opposition party in a FPTP system rather than Third party it suggests they want a government out rather than just to give them a kick. The three questions for the Lib Dems are

1. can we repair our credibility quickly enough so we get a share of this time for change mood?

2. Why are we not as attractive as we were in 01/05 parliament

3. Are our resources being focused in vulnerable Labour seats and anto tory defences? ie where they will do most good. or are some people looking at last times results and say “one more heave” in many southern constituiencies?

But ultimately I agree with Lord Greaves. At this stage in a parliament I don’t think polls matter that much.

by David Morton on March 29, 2008 at 6:35 pm. Reply #

Leave your comment


Required. Not published.

If you have one.