Stop all the clocks, cut off the Prime Minister

by Stephen Tall on September 5, 2006

There was much talk last week of ‘tragic flaws’. So what are Mr Blair’s? (It seems about the right time to start the retrospectives – though, please God, tell me Labour’s self-indulgent soap opera isn’t going to run another 12 months?)

Two exempla from this year:

First, when the ‘cash for peerages’ row ignited following the arrests of government advisor Des Smith and New Labour fundraiser Lord Levy, it was perfectly clear that Mr Blair just could not understand what all the fuss was about. He ignored the issue – not out of embarrassment or shame, but genuinely bewilderment that the media or public could bother their pretty heads about such a trifle.

He could have got away either with contrition, or a robust denial of any wrongdoing. What harmed him most was the appearance that he just didn’t care if the accusations were true or not – probably because he didn’t. Mr Blair regards himself as a pretty straight kind of guy: and that should be enough for the rest of us.

Secondly, when Ming Campbell stood up in the House of Commons, on 19th July, to call for an immediate ceasefire between Israel and Lebanon Mr Blair ridiculed the suggestion. A fortnight later he delayed his holiday to help achieve just that aim – not because of public discontent or the mutinous mood among Labour MPs, but because President Bush finally acknowledged there was no alternative.

Mr Blair has always argued – and most of us have accepted – that he can’t do a Hugh Grant in Love Actually, and let rip against the Americans on a whim. The trade-off he sold us was clear. He would be circumspect in public about US human rights abuses in (for example) Guantanamo Bay; and, in return, would earn real leverage with the White House in private. The Israel-Lebanon conflict revealed not only that Mr Blair has scant disagreement with Mr Bush’s neo-con agenda; but also quite how marginal is his behind-the-scenes influence.

The easy accusation to fling at Mr Blair is arrogance – and in a sense that’s fair enough. His transcendental response to ‘cash for peerages’ was arrogant. His slavish devotion to Mr Bush’s disastrous foreign policy is arrogant – though one might, more kindly, ascribe it simply to a catastrophic miscalculation of Britain’s solo place in the global pecking order.

Mr Blair is formidably impressive, and without doubt the most articulate, clear-sighted and instinctual politician of his generation. That he has largely failed as Prime Minister is something which will eat away at him during his long retirement. His memoirs, when he writes them, will not be written for the public. Mr Blair will have just two audiences in mind: himself and posterity. And that will be an apt epitaph in itself.

There comes a point when a politician fails to listen to the voters, and that is the point when a politician stops being heard. Mr Blair has passed this point of no return. Whether he resigns now, next May, or a year today is irrelevant. Today was the day he finally lost power.

The rest of his Premiership will be idle clock-watching. The time will pass very quickly for him, and very slowly for us. Better if the clock were stopped now.

Enjoy reading this? Please like and share:


I thought the funniest thing about the Lebanon episode was his being told that he “couldn’t go” by Bush when he offered to try and broker some kind of deal on the ground.

And I’m not sure I’d agree he is or was whatever you called it – the most clear sighted etc politician of his generation. I’d just say he was the best spun one. I don’t think arrogance is something that comes to you half way through a premiership. It’s an attitude that has been with him since Beaconsfield….:)

My one regret is that he appeaqrs, nearly, still to be chosing the time of his own going. The High Court of Parliament should have made that decision when he committed his fellow citizens to die for a series of lies.

His biggest contribution for me has been the ammunition he and his government have given that we don’t actually need his sort of centralising overbearing leadership. We have been fortunate to be able to watch in slow motion the sort of egos and attitudes to others that allows nations to sink into totalitarianism. And can say “never again”.

by Jock Coats on September 6, 2006 at 6:48 am. Reply #

The attempt to impeach Blair, which seemed to be progressing well in the first half of the year, now has stalled.

Surely it is time to reactive the attempt. Blair is concerned about is ‘place ub history’, surely starting an illegal war AND impeachment would be a legacy long remebered

by Bryan McGrath on September 6, 2006 at 11:08 am. Reply #

Leave your comment


Required. Not published.

If you have one.