What’s sauce for the BBC…

by Stephen Tall on July 11, 2006

The Times’s David Aaronovitch makes a compelling point in his article today, No, Mr Humphrys, there is no excuse for probing into the DPM’s sex life:

last Thursday listeners to the Today programme heard John Humphrys ask the following question to the Deputy Prime Minister: “There are now reports, and they’re circulating on the internet, as you know, that you have had other affairs — is that true?” Let me just stop here for a moment. I went to work at the BBC in current affairs in January 1988. I stayed for seven years, working in political news and — for six months — on the Today programme. I was at the BBC throughout the David Mellor affair. It is inconceivable that such a question would have been asked ten years ago. It would have been considered a breach of journalistic standards.

But I can’t help feeling Mr Aaronovitch’s case is slightly undermined by The Times’s choice of lead story on page 27, peddling allegations about Tommy Sheridan MSP, leader of the Scottish Socialist Party:

Sheridan ‘had group sex with his brother-in-law’

Enjoy reading this? Please like and share:


I suppose the argument would be that this is reporting from a court case whereas the questions to DPM were based on internet rumour.

by Arwen Folkes on July 11, 2006 at 1:18 pm. Reply #

I wonder if, by any chance that this article catches the appropriate eye, Aaronovitch’s view will affect his proprietor’s other journals of record and high moral tone – the Sun and the News of the World?

by Anonymous on July 11, 2006 at 3:24 pm. Reply #

Former leader of the SSP.

by Anonymous on July 17, 2006 at 10:46 am. Reply #

Leave your comment


Required. Not published.

If you have one.